• Welcome to Jetboaters.net!

    We are delighted you have found your way to the best Jet Boaters Forum on the internet! Please consider Signing Up so that you can enjoy all the features and offers on the forum. We have members with boats from all the major manufacturers including Yamaha, Seadoo, Scarab and Chaparral. We don't email you SPAM, and the site is totally non-commercial. So what's to lose? IT IS FREE!

    Membership allows you to ask questions (no matter how mundane), meet up with other jet boaters, see full images (not just thumbnails), browse the member map and qualifies you for members only discounts offered by vendors who run specials for our members only! (It also gets rid of this banner!)

    free hit counter
  • Guest, we are pleased to announce that Hydrophase Ridesteady is offering an extra $100 off for JETBOATERS.NET members on any Ridesteady for Yamaha Speed Control system purchased through March 7th, 2025. Ridesteady is a speed control system (“cruise control”) that uses GPS satellites or engine RPM to keep your boat at the set speed you choose. On twin engine boats, it will also automatically synchronize your engines.

    Click Here for more information>Ride Steady group buy for JetBoaters.net members only

    You can dismiss this Notice by clicking the "X" in the upper right>>>>>

2017 Ar210 power

Nimrod_R

Well-Known Member
Messages
16
Reaction score
9
Points
62
Location
Pensacola Florida
Boat Make
Yamaha
Year
2017
Boat Model
AR
Boat Length
24
So am I understanding this correctly. The 2017 ar210 with the tr1 engines have 230hp, only 10 higher than the 2015 models with the mr1 engines? If thats true then they have the worst power to weight ratio of all the models. But when you move up to the Ar240 and above models you get 320hp? I have seen alot of different statements so I was just wondering. You would think that the Yamaha website would post numbers but they dont.......
 
The MR1 is 110 hp each and the TR1 is 115 hp. The 1.8l is 180 hp, and the 1.8l SVHO in the 195 is 250 hp.
 
Adding to that, the MR-1 HO engines used outside of the 210 series are 160 HP.

Yamaha is not big on publishing horsepower claims. Generally the numbers documented for the ratings agencies are lower than those rarely used in marketing.

Yamaha boats always have higher performance than BRP powered boats of similar size and similar or horsepower rating.

The 210 series is a budget minded boat with just enough power. If you step up to the 212 series you will receive 360 HP in the same hull but I fail to understand why anyone would opt for a 19 or 21 foot boat anyway.
 
You do have a point though as it pertains to the new 21 foot boats. Outside of the 210 they are really expensive in which case you do have to ask yourself why not just get a 24'
 
You do have a point though as it pertains to the new 21 foot boats. Outside of the 210 they are really expensive in which case you do have to ask yourself why not just get a 24'
Yeah, it's a slippery logic slope, which is why I ended up with a 24 footer. Started out looking at 19s but really wanted the wider beam and twin engine. So was dead set on a AR210 but then was worried about power and outgrowing it quickly. Next thing you know I'm look at a new prior year 242 Limited S and now I've put 20 hours on it.
 
Last edited:
The MR1 is 110 hp each and the TR1 is 115 hp. The 1.8l is 180 hp, and the 1.8l SVHO in the 195 is 250 hp.
Yea thats what I meant, I was just giving the 2 engine together rating of 220 and 230, thanks for the rest of the info.
 
The 210 series is a budget minded boat with just enough power. If you step up to the 212 series you will receive 360 HP in the same hull but I fail to understand why anyone would opt for a 19 or 21 foot boat anyway.
The budget was for a 190 or 195 but when we got in them they were just to small and the low windshield made me hit my head sitting in the passenger seat when turned around to spot. So I was forced to look at the next step up "210" but my favorite of course would be the 242x e-series. Just way to much money. The 212x would be a good substitute for me but still above price range.
 
The budget was for a 190 or 195 but when we got in them they were just to small and the low windshield made me hit my head sitting in the passenger seat when turned around to spot. So I was forced to look at the next step up "210" but my favorite of course would be the 242x e-series. Just way to much money. The 212x would be a good substitute for me but still above price range.

You can buy a very nice used twin engine Yamaha for less than a 190/195. If you shop around you will be able to find one with nice upgrades beyond what Yamaha offers.
 
The 212x is definitely the coolest looking boat in the 21' lineup, but 212x jumped way up in price this last year with upgrades you may not really need. Looking used is definitely the most practical option if you are on a tighter budget. I do think Yamaha should equip some other models with the aggressive graphics. I know some may prefer the classic look, but even the other models with a wake tower have pretty boring appearances.

A new 212x cost more than an AR240, I just don't see the value in the 212x. If money isn't an issue sure, but you introduce budgets and you can get more bang for your buck in other models. Either a used AR240 or 212x save some of that dough for upgrades, or like Bruce says above find one with some upgrades already on it.
 
My biggest fear as well. Have a family of 6 and was scared we would outgrow the TR1's. Bought a 2014 AR240 and have not been disappointed. Granted we moved from a 18' Bayliner, but still the performance is night and day. Used is an option to consider, especially if you're worried about size/power.
 
The 212x is definitely the coolest looking boat in the 21' lineup, but 212x jumped way up in price this last year with upgrades you may not really need. Looking used is definitely the most practical option if you are on a tighter budget. I do think Yamaha should equip some other models with the aggressive graphics. I know some may prefer the classic look, but even the other models with a wake tower have pretty boring appearances.

A new 212x cost more than an AR240, I just don't see the value in the 212x. If money isn't an issue sure, but you introduce budgets and you can get more bang for your buck in other models. Either a used AR240 or 212x save some of that dough for upgrades, or like Bruce says above find one with some upgrades already on it.
Especially when you can add the ballast and stereo system yourself for cheaper.
 
Back
Top