Map Source

[FSH 210 Sport]

Found this on line map this morning…it’s not just Sakakawea you can scroll all over the country.

https://usa.fishermap.org/depth-map/lake-sakakawea/

 

[biffdotorg]

That's an amazing resource! Thank you.

 

[FSH 210 Sport]

That's an amazing resource! Thank you.

Glad I could help out!

 

[zackmorris]

This is an awesome chart. Even covers offshore. Thanks for sharing.

 

[2kwik4u]

Found this on line map this morning…it’s not just Sakakawea you can scroll all over the country.

https://usa.fishermap.org/depth-map/lake-sakakawea/

Awesome. Thanks for sharing. This is better than Navionics online stuff (at least easier to use anyway).

 

[King]

Found this on line map this morning…it’s not just Sakakawea you can scroll all over the country.

https://usa.fishermap.org/depth-map/lake-sakakawea/

@FSH 210 Sport,

That's a spectacular tool! It reminds me of the military issued topographical maps we were given back in High School JROTC on the Orienteering Team. And the fishing reports on accessible from the main page had reports even for the tiny little places that are close to the house.

Thank you for posting this.

King

 

[Ericd]

Great map - thanks.

 

[fatboyroy]

saved in my favorite. great find!

 

[OurCrew]

Thanks, I used it to find the map for

Chadwick Bay (NC)
USA, North Carolina

then was able to follow it up the New River to my house

Same just removed original lake and it gives choices of other lakes or bay

https://usa.fishermap.org/depth-map

 

[FSH 210 Sport]

Thanks, I used it to find the map for

Chadwick Bay (NC)
USA, North Carolina

then was able to follow it up the New River to my house

Same just removed original lake and it gives choices of other lakes or bay

https://usa.fishermap.org/depth-map

Right on! I‘m glad you found it useful… was just showing it to a friend last night at dinner.. he was very impressed… and I found it on a random search for another map… sometimes the internet is truly great.

 

[mrcleanr6]

this is a really good tool. i will say that the depths do error on the side of caution too. i just looked up areas of the icw going to atlantic city. there are many eras there where the depth is about 22 ft and the chart is showing 9. not sure what that is all about. maybe its not up to date or maybe that is the lowest ever recorded or something like that. other areas like in the bay here are fairly accurate but always off on the lower side which is good.

 

[mrcleanr6]

Awesome. Thanks for sharing. This is better than Navionics online stuff (at least easier to use anyway).

actually i just looked at this again and these are navionics charts. navionics is watermarked right on it.

 

[FSH 210 Sport]

this is a really good tool. i will say that the depths do error on the side of caution too. i just looked up areas of the icw going to atlantic city. there are many eras there where the depth is about 22 ft and the chart is showing 9. not sure what that is all about. maybe its not up to date or maybe that is the lowest ever recorded or something like that. other areas like in the bay here are fairly accurate but always off on the lower side which is good.

Could it just be showing the depths at a certain “tide” level?

 

[mrcleanr6]

yes, the depths on charts are supposed to be low tide but we dont have that big of a tide swing here. i think maybe that area of the icw the depths havent been updated in awhile. markers and channels are all correct as i was running up and down there yesterday with the connext plotter on the screen. just the depths seem to be off. just wondering if they got those depths during some freak blow out tide or something. not a big deal really. now if the chart said 22ft and it was actually 9...then we got a problem lol

 

[2kwik4u]

actually i just looked at this again and these are navionics charts. navionics is watermarked right on it.

Def easier to use than Navionics even if it's the same info.

 

[mrcleanr6]

Agreed